Loeilad Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 so every bullet will be accounted for and every slug recovered and a full report handed to the courts?...I would be very surprised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F4UCorsair Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 Summary justice......I love it. No trial costs, no jail costs, and just maybe a deterrent value? The cops aren't always right, but I believe that if you run, you're target practice. In the event of a car chase, I'm an advocate of a helicopter and marksmen being the first tool to use. At the first opportunity where there will be no collateral injury, shoot to kill. A car at high speed has the potential to kill many people...a marksman can prevent that happening. Those involved in running from cops are at the bottom of the scale, and not required in society, ANY society. I'm over pussy footing by Australian cops, and authorities, on this issue. Well done RTP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 4 hours ago, Lupatria said: The budget for this kind of equipment was probably spent on i-phones, tablets, and parachuter wings... Or long lunches... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujayujay Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 4 hours ago, saminoz said: Hmmm, you take everything the RTP say at face value? The offside tyres are intact and the car looks level to me. The other photo in Manager ONline seems to show the nearside rear still inflated as well. This is typical of the Thai Police who overreact (as unprofessional as they are) and then make up stories to match their version of events (Koh Tao anyone?). How about a non-lethal takedown? The car had obviously been rear ended (by the RTP?) and looked to be leaking fluids. Perhaps they could have been waited out. I don't believe for a moment anything the BiB, mafia that they are, says in connection with their duties. Oh God,dumb babblers are the hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 11 hours ago, Loeilad said: so every bullet will be accounted for and every slug recovered and a full report handed to the courts?...I would be very surprised It shouldn't be hard to sort this out. 1.Police set up a roadblock requiring all vehicles to stop for inspection. 2. This car crashes through this and several other roadblocks. 3. Occupants of fleeing vehicle open fire on police at each checkpoint. 4. Police return fire , disable the vehicle and in an exchange of fire, the fleeing gunmen are killed. What is it about this story you find hard to believe? This isn't Kansas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvr181 Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 Live by the sword, die by the sword. How sad, too bad, never mind - s**t happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catman20 Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 live by the sword die by the sword Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honthy Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 I think even if they are hoodlums or not and even if they behaved themselves really silly there are some other, more peacefully solutions to stop a car than shooting them down. It reminds me of the golden era of Wild Western somehow ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulic Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 Don't really know what these guys deal was. No mention of drugs or cash. Now they are dead we will never hear. Weapons, anti retroviral drugs, tattoos. Oh well, when you engage with police, running check points and exchange of gunfire you have to expect this outcome. Condolences to their parents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 57 minutes ago, Honthy said: I think even if they are hoodlums or not and even if they behaved themselves really silly there are some other, more peacefully solutions to stop a car than shooting them down. It reminds me of the golden era of Wild Western somehow ...... "....there are some other, more peacefully solutions to stop a car than shooting them down. " That comment is as cute as your avatar. These lowlifes ran three checkpoints, shot at police with intention to kill and you want them to have a nice chat with the cops over coffee? It was a case of it's them or us. Fortunately no cops or innocents died. The police did not instigate this, the punks did. They went ahead, they made my day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinsdale Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 13 hours ago, webfact said: Still the occupant now in their disabled vehicle refused to give up and the decision was taken to shoot into the body of the car and kill the occupants. The rest of the article may or may not be factual but I'm a bit perplexed with this bit "Still .....in their disabled vehicle [they] refused to give up and the decision was taken to shoot". Were they still shooting at this time? Refused to give up is not clear. Also where were the (fatal) shots into the car. Windscreen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xircal Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 Antiretroviral drugs are used in the treatment of HIV: http://www.fda.gov/ForPatients/Illness/HIVAIDS/Treatment/ucm118915.htm Maybe both of them had just discovered they had developed AIDS and decided on suicide by cop rather than face a;slow death from the disease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berybert Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 9 hours ago, Mangkorndang said: "Both men were heavily tattooed." The relevance of this is ? Oh sorry I forgot. In LOS tattoos instantly make you a criminal. Shoot away BIB. I think the fact 3 guns were used to shoot at the police was more the reason the BIB fired back rather than the tattoos. Think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim walker Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 heavily tattooed then ok shoot to kill that’s all you can do with this type of person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerone Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 9 hours ago, Docno said: No causal effect, but there is a correlation... a colleague of mine, for instance, did a study that found that having three or more tattoos was a good predictor of having significant disciplinary issues ('going to the brig') in the army. It doesn't mean that everyone with lots of tattoos is a criminal or that ink-free people are all saints, but there does seem to be a correlation. And it's important to note that this correlation is probably diminishing as tattoos become more the norm in each generation... what a bunch of bull@#$t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djayz Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 A few idiots less on the roads... Now, if only the cops would do the same for.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerone Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 8 hours ago, gchurch259 said: Seems pretty simple to me, You shoot at me expect me to return the favor, of course in LOS I do not have my weapons, Damn !! Isn't clear if they had guns and they shoot, could anyone enlight me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loeilad Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 8 hours ago, ratcatcher said: It shouldn't be hard to sort this out. 1.Police set up a roadblock requiring all vehicles to stop for inspection. 2. This car crashes through this and several other roadblocks. 3. Occupants of fleeing vehicle open fire on police at each checkpoint. 4. Police return fire , disable the vehicle and in an exchange of fire, the fleeing gunmen are killed. What is it about this story you find hard to believe? This isn't Kansas. well assuming you weren't there, what is the source of your information? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get Real Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 11 hours ago, Loeilad said: so every bullet will be accounted for and every slug recovered and a full report handed to the courts?...I would be very surprised Let me help you little bit here. Not at all. The Thai police, laws and judical system does not work like in your home country. Some people say it doesn´t work at all, while others ay that it works it´s own little peculiar way. How ever, that is not the point here! There are 3 good reasons for why there´s no need for bullet and slug counting. * As a first point there is a long chase where police are hunting a car with to people that are shooting wild and running trough ceckpoints without stopping. Someone must have recorded this event, as everything else today. * Second there is a car that is stopped with evidence of recently fired guns. * As a last point, it would be impossible to find all the slugs if they were shooting while driving. Out of the information in the article, it actually seems like there is not much to investigate here too. Just silly trying to put down the work of the police when it´s done the right way. There is enough cases where you can doubt their work anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbbbooboo Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 Hmmmm......appropriate ending.Death stops repeat offending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loeilad Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 You are naive and uninformed to the point of risibility...all information regarding this incident has cone from the police....I'm pointing out that there is no accountability here...whether or not the story is wholely or partly true is completely irrelevant...It seens you are just the kind of person this junta relies on to get by. There ALWAYS needs to be a full inquiry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prbkk Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 15 hours ago, Mangkorndang said: "Both men were heavily tattooed." The relevance of this is ? Oh sorry I forgot. In LOS tattoos instantly make you a criminal. Shoot away BIB. Well, that was the issue in Indonesia as well: people being tagged for death because they had tattoos, regardless of any criminality. In Islam a tattoo is a sign of a nonbeliever ( being haram). It's a slippery slope to make a nexus, as in this article, between having a tatt and being a crook ( nothwithstanding the fact that these two appear to have been ratbags...it doesn't justify extra judicial killing). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essaybloke Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 'heavily tattooed...' mmmm.... mai dee..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get Real Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 hour ago, Loeilad said: You are naive and uninformed to the point of risibility...all information regarding this incident has cone from the police....I'm pointing out that there is no accountability here...whether or not the story is wholely or partly true is completely irrelevant...It seens you are just the kind of person this junta relies on to get by. There ALWAYS needs to be a full inquiry As always I have to point out the obvious twice. It doesn´t work like it does in your country here. Just like it, or leave it. Another option is to not care som much about the things you can not change. Much other options you just don´t have. Maby got it now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coma Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 17 hours ago, thai3 said: Hoodlums lives matter, er well no they don't. Not when they are guns blazing with the police in ear shot of a school. Good result that it was only said hoodlums that got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumbles Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Saves the cost of a trial & the expense of keeping them in the monkey house. All in all a good outcome, should be more of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangon04 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 If this event had taken place in the Philippines, a lot of the readers would be unsure about whether the police could be trusted to truthfully report the facts. Here it seems the "hoodlums" deserved all they got. Where is the difference? And yes the tyres in the OP photo do not look like they were shot out as claimed by the police. Maybe they just missed..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tandor Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 18 hours ago, jerojero said: RTP doesn't own a set of spike strips? Instant slow down. ..someone sold em to the scrap metal man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honthy Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 9 hours ago, ratcatcher said: "....there are some other, more peacefully solutions to stop a car than shooting them down. " That comment is as cute as your avatar. These lowlifes ran three checkpoints, shot at police with intention to kill and you want them to have a nice chat with the cops over coffee? It was a case of it's them or us. Fortunately no cops or innocents died. The police did not instigate this, the punks did. They went ahead, they made my day. I don't want to criticize your avatar.... I do not like cats. Basiically agree, but the reason why most of the similar actions are usually finished by not killing the bad boys is that police can get information when theey alive. Some evidences helping the work of the police may be found in the car but a living hoodlum can speak. Surely they were deeply involved in crime, not because of their tattoos, just before ..... Otherwise, mybe in your country you do not know, but in Europe police have road blocks which definitely stops the car.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 4 minutes ago, Honthy said: I don't want to criticize your avatar.... I do not like cats. Basiically agree, but the reason why most of the similar actions are usually finished by not killing the bad boys is that police can get information when theey alive. Some evidences helping the work of the police may be found in the car but a living hoodlum can speak. Surely they were deeply involved in crime, not because of their tattoos, just before ..... Otherwise, mybe in your country you do not know, but in Europe police have road blocks which definitely stops the car.... Thank you. Interesting points you make. OK. I'm Canadian and very likely, had the same situation occurred with the fleeing suspects shooting at police, there is a very good chance the RCMP would have taken the same action, that is shoot to kill. When the lives of police officers are on the line and all attempts at stopping the suspects have failed, then what the cops did was "To serve and protect". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.