AGareth2 Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 no his mate was lent the money there is a difference in the English language Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveE13 Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 So have the Cambodian police picked these guys up yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, AGareth2 said: no his mate was lent the money there is a difference in the English language His mate wouldn't pay him back, he ripped him off, that's why he went to the police. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGareth2 Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Bluespunk said: His mate wouldn't pay him back, he ripped him off, that's why he went to the police. that is better sorry if you're not a NES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 13 minutes ago, AGareth2 said: that is better sorry if you're not a NES Fluent all my life or at least from when I began to speak... I knew what I meant as did you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonjelly Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 If someone borrowed 8 million from me and didn't pay it back, I'd feel ripped off, as well as some other things too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdgbb Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 20 hours ago, Bluespunk said: The facts are clear enough. His mate took 8 million baht and did not pay it back. That is ripping him off. Clearly the dead man thought so...he went to the BIB {already made clear what I think of that} I'd say that was... Ho hum...you're still trying to keep this going? Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGareth2 Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 no his mate was lent the money there is a difference in the English language an act or instance of ripping off another or others; a theft, cheat, or swindle. 2. exploitation, especially of those who cannot prevent or counter it. 3. a copy or imitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 1 hour ago, gdgbb said: Ho hum...you're still trying to keep this going? Unbelievable. Ah, the irony of it all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarryP Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 1 hour ago, AGareth2 said: no his mate was lent the money there is a difference in the English language an act or instance of ripping off another or others; a theft, cheat, or swindle. 2. exploitation, especially of those who cannot prevent or counter it. 3. a copy or imitation. Okay. You are saying that if he lent the money to his mate and was not paid back, he was not ripped off. Well please explain, in layman's terms, what it means to lend money and fail to receive repayment. Would that not equate with "cheat, theft or swindle" or does one have to have that intention at the time of taking the loan. Pedants unite!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGareth2 Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 bad debt non performing loan ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarryP Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 33 minutes ago, AGareth2 said: bad debt non performing loan ?? I am so happy that I have a non-performing loan and have not been ripped off!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGareth2 Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 should be careful who you lend money to as well as taking collateral as security Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Especially if you and your mates are ''boiler room'' scum, prone to ripping people off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroveHillWanderer Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 On 03/02/2017 at 7:44 PM, JAG said: It really doesn't matter how much he is loathed here on TVF, or what he has or is alleged to have done, Interpol won't touch him, it's political. I'm not sure what you mean by "won't touch him." If you mean won't arrest him, then no they won't, because they have no arrest powers. All Interpol does basically is pass on information and act as a liaison between countries if requested. Even if they have issued a "Red Notice" for someone (what is sometimes loosely referred to as an international arrest warrant, although it is no such thing) then as it says on their website, "INTERPOL cannot compel any member country to arrest an individual who is the subject of a Red Notice. Each member country decides for itself what legal value to give a Red Notice within their borders." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroveHillWanderer Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 On 03/02/2017 at 3:21 PM, localczar said: How can you know if Interpol is involved? Seems Interpol didn't care about Thaksin's fugitive status while he wandered the globe....but he's not wanted for murder. Again, not sure what is meant by "didn't care." Once they have issued a Red Notice (which I am given to understand they did) then, as mentioned above that's all they can do, they have no powers either to arrest anyone or to force the country where the person is, to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.