Jump to content
BANGKOK

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

webfact

Two who killed man for iPhone sentenced to death

Recommended Posts

Two who killed man for iPhone sentenced to death
By The Nation

 

6fe489fe91e1e189581ceb420417895c.jpg

Supatchai Chansi, (left) and Kittikorn Wiphana are taken to the Criminal Court to hear the ruling against them Wednesday.

 

BANGKOK: -- Two men have been sentenced to die for killing a man over his iPhone in January.

 

The Criminal Court on Wednesday sentenced Kittikorn Wiphana, 26, and Supatchai Chansi, 25, to death, declining to commute the sentence even though they confessed to the crime.

 

The court reasoned that they pleaded guilty only because the evidence against them was so strong.

 

Prosecutors presented a CCTV surveillance recording that showed Kittikorn stabbing Wasin Luangjaem several times in the torso and once in his throat before snatching his mobile phone and fleeing on a motorcycle driven by Supatchai.

 

The murder occurred at 11pm on January 4 at the mouth of Soi Sukhonsawat 27 in Bangkok’s Lat Phrao district. The men were arrested in Nonthaburi the following day.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30316814

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-05-31

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, cornishcarlos said:

About time this lawless society was reigned in... Will it deter others ? Lets hope so....

But of course it doesn't act as a deterrent, proven time after time around the world. It might meet the need for vengeance, might make people feel safer...but it will not serve any useful purpose .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, cornishcarlos said:

About time this lawless society was reigned in... Will it deter others ? Lets hope so....

No it wont, because people don't expect to be caught or weigh the pros/cons. Murder isn't a rational decision.  

 

 

These two have wasted the poor victims life and their own. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, webfact said:

The Criminal Court on Wednesday sentenced Kittikorn Wiphana, 26, and Supatchai Chansi, 25, to death, declining to commute the sentence even though they confessed to the crime.

 

The court reasoned that they pleaded guilty only because the evidence against them was so strong.

While I don't agree with the halving of sentences for confessing, why should the fact there is strong evidence make a difference in applying the rule?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

iPhone killer gets death sentence

By Sasiwan Mokkhasen, Staff Reporter

 

BANGKOK — Two ex-convicts who stabbed a man to death stealing his iPhone were given death sentences by the Criminal Court on Wednesday.

 

Kittikorn Wikaha, 26, and Supattanachai Chansri, 25, did not get reduced sentences despite confessing to stabbing Vasin Lueangcham, 26, on a January night in northern Bangkok, an attack that prompted national revulsion when footage of it was widely watched.

 

WARNING! Graphic content

 

 

Full story:  http://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/crimecourtscalamity/2017/05/31/iphone-killer-gets-death-sentence/

 
khaosodeng_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Khaosod English 2017-05-31

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Prbkk said:

But of course it doesn't act as a deterrent, proven time after time around the world. It might meet the need for vengeance, might make people feel safer...but it will not serve any useful purpose .

 

Better stick with the 500 baht fine system then, that seems to work a treat !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just goes to show justice can be served. Although it also goes how different the serving of justice can be. On the one hand a callous murder has ended with a quick sentencing, on the other a callous running over of an officer of the law is 4-5 years old and still no action. (Again it has suddenly gone very very quiet. Would be worth finding out whether Thailand did actually file anything with Interpol or just talked a lot and waited for it to blow over again)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

While I don't agree with the halving of sentences for confessing, why should the fact there is strong evidence make a difference in applying the rule?

My understanding in this, and I may be wrong,  was that they confessed only after having seen the overwhelming evidence against them....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They get what they deserved. I'm still amazed with people opposing death penalty because only strict law will deter people from committing these kind of crimes.

 

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cornishcarlos said:

 

Better stick with the 500 baht fine system then, that seems to work a treat !!

No, I think 30 years would be a good starting point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Prbkk said:

No, I think 30 years would be a good starting point. 

I agree with you  Paulie Walnuts. Do you mean 30 years minimum time served?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Prbkk said:

No, I think 30 years would be a good starting point. 

 

Well everyone is entitled to their own opinion. The world is over populated as it is, we really don't need low lifes killing for IPhones... Just my opinion :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...